No submission language available for this problem.

Description

Input

The input consists of multiple test cases. The first line contains a single integer $t$ ($1 \leq t \leq 100$) — the number of test cases. Description of the test cases follows.

The first line of each test case contains an integer $n$ ($1\le n\le 100$) — the length of the arrays.

The second line of each test case contains $n$ integers $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n$ ($1 \le a_i \le 10\,000$) where $a_i$ is the $i$-th element of the array $a$.

The third line of each test case contains $n$ integers $b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n$ ($1 \le b_i \le 10\,000$) where $b_i$ is the $i$-th element of the array $b$.

Output

For each test case, print a single integer, the minimum possible value of $\max(a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n) \cdot \max(b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n)$ you can get after applying such operation any number of times.

Samples

3
6
1 2 6 5 1 2
3 4 3 2 2 5
3
3 3 3
3 3 3
2
1 2
2 1

18
9
2

Note

In the first test, you can apply the operations at indices $2$ and $6$, then $a = [1, 4, 6, 5, 1, 5]$ and $b = [3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2]$, $\max(1, 4, 6, 5, 1, 5) \cdot \max(3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 2) = 6 \cdot 3 = 18$.

In the second test, no matter how you apply the operations, $a = [3, 3, 3]$ and $b = [3, 3, 3]$ will always hold, so the answer is $\max(3, 3, 3) \cdot \max(3, 3, 3) = 3 \cdot 3 = 9$.

In the third test, you can apply the operation at index $1$, then $a = [2, 2]$, $b = [1, 1]$, so the answer is $\max(2, 2) \cdot \max(1, 1) = 2 \cdot 1 = 2$.