#P297B. Fish Weight

    ID: 2665 Type: RemoteJudge 1000ms 256MiB Tried: 0 Accepted: 0 Difficulty: (None) Uploaded By: Tags>constructive algorithmsgreedy*1600

Fish Weight

No submission language available for this problem.

Description

It is known that there are k fish species in the polar ocean, numbered from 1 to k. They are sorted by non-decreasing order of their weight, which is a positive number. Let the weight of the i-th type of fish be wi, then 0 < w1 ≤ w2 ≤ ... ≤ wk holds.

Polar bears Alice and Bob each have caught some fish, and they are guessing who has the larger sum of weight of the fish he/she's caught. Given the type of the fish they've caught, determine whether it is possible that the fish caught by Alice has a strictly larger total weight than Bob's. In other words, does there exist a sequence of weights wi (not necessary integers), such that the fish caught by Alice has a strictly larger total weight?

The first line contains three integers n, m, k (1 ≤ n, m ≤ 105, 1 ≤ k ≤ 109) — the number of fish caught by Alice and Bob respectively, and the number of fish species.

The second line contains n integers each from 1 to k, the list of fish type caught by Alice. The third line contains m integers each from 1 to k, the list of fish type caught by Bob.

Note that one may have caught more than one fish for a same species.

Output "YES" (without quotes) if it is possible, and "NO" (without quotes) otherwise.

Input

The first line contains three integers n, m, k (1 ≤ n, m ≤ 105, 1 ≤ k ≤ 109) — the number of fish caught by Alice and Bob respectively, and the number of fish species.

The second line contains n integers each from 1 to k, the list of fish type caught by Alice. The third line contains m integers each from 1 to k, the list of fish type caught by Bob.

Note that one may have caught more than one fish for a same species.

Output

Output "YES" (without quotes) if it is possible, and "NO" (without quotes) otherwise.

Samples

3 3 3
2 2 2
1 1 3

YES

4 7 9
5 2 7 3
3 5 2 7 3 8 7

NO

Note

In the first sample, if w1 = 1, w2 = 2, w3 = 2.5, then Alice has a total of 2 + 2 + 2 = 6 weight units, while Bob only has 1 + 1 + 2.5 = 4.5.

In the second sample, the fish that Alice caught is a subset of Bob's. Therefore, the total weight of Bob’s fish is always not less than the total weight of Alice’s fish.